August 9, 2005
August 9, 2005
Virginia:
At a Continued Meeting of the Nelson County Board of Supervisors on
August 9, 2005, 10:30 a.m., at the Courthouse in Lovingston, Virginia,
thereof:
Present: Gary E. Wood, Chair
Harry S. Harris, Vice Chair
Constance Brennan, Central District Supervisor
Thomas H. Bruguiere, Jr., West District Supervisor
Thomas D. Harvey, North District Supervisor
Stephen A. Carter, County Administrator
Fred M. Boger, Planning Director
Virgie A. Carter, Deputy Clerk
Betty F. Fortune, Planning Secretary
Agenda Item Number I. Call Meeting to Order
Chair Wood called the Meeting to order.
Agenda Item Number II. Review of Zoning Ordinance
The Board of Supervisors continued review of the proposed Zoning Ordinance as follows:
CHAPTER 8 - PARKING AND LOADING
Deleted Chapter 8 and included Section 12-7 of the existing
ordinance.
Mr. Boger was directed to review the number of spaces required
for each use in the proposed and existing ordinance and use the lesser
number. Parking for Nursery Schools and Child Care was changed
from one space for each twenty children to one space for each ten
children.
CHAPTER 10 - SIGN REGULATIONS
G. Exempt Signs 19. Decals
Deleted.
H. Temporary Signs
Changed the permit for a temporary sign from thirty days to ninety days.
I. Prohibited Signs - 7. Tree, Utility Pole and Other Related Signs
Deleted utility poles.
I. Prohibited Signs - 8. Signs Projecting Over a Public Right-of-Way
Added a minimum height of eight feet for any signs approved by the Planning Commission that will project over a right-of-way.
I. Prohibited Signs - 10. Signs Attached to Freestanding Sign
Changed "Separate signs attached to a freestanding sign or its
supporting structure, advertising services (including but not limited
to) automobile travel clubs and credit cards to separate signs attached
to a freestanding sign or its supporting structure, except those
advertising related services such as automobile travel clubs and credit
cards, as long as the total allowed sign square footage is not exceeded."
J. Nonconforming Signs - 3.
Deleted "composition" and "color" in the sentence, "Nonconforming signs
shall not be repainted or refaced when such action alters or changes
the wording, composition, color or material of the sign unless such a
change is specifically authorized by the Planning Director."
Agenda Item Number III. Other Matters
No other matters were discussed.
Agenda Item Number IV. Adjournment
Re: Adjournment
On a motion by Mr. Harvey, seconded by Ms. Brennan, with Mr. Harvey
voting yes, Ms. Brennan voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere voting yes, Mr.
Harris voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution
was adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby adjourn the August 9, 2005, 10:30 a.m. Meeting.
________________________________, Chair
August 9, 2005
Virginia:
At a Regular Meeting of the Nelson County Board of Supervisors on
August 9, 2005, 2:00 p.m., at the Courthouse in Lovingston, Virginia,
thereof:
Present: Gary E. Wood, Chair
Harry S. Harris, Vice Chair
Constance Brennan, Central District Supervisor
Thomas H. Bruguiere, Jr., West District Supervisor
Thomas D. Harvey, North District Supervisor
Stephen A. Carter, County Administrator
Fred M. Boger, Planning Director
Virgie A. Carter, Deputy Clerk
Agenda Item Number 1. Call Meeting to Order
Supervisor Wood called the Meeting to order.
A. Moment of Silence
B. Pledge of Allegiance: Supervisor Brennan
Agenda Item Number II. Consent Agenda
A. Minutes
B. Refunds
C. Resolution, Blue Ridge Trail Agreement
D. FY 2005-2006 Budget Amendment
E. Resolution, National Incident Management System
F. Jackets: Boy’s Soccer Team
The Board of Supervisors approved the Consent Agenda, exclusive of the Minutes, as follows:
Re: Approval of Consent Agenda
On a motion by Mr. Harris, seconded by Ms. Brennan, with Mr. Harris
voting yes, Ms. Brennan voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere voting yes, Mr.
Harvey voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution
was adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
A. Refunds
Re: Approval of Refunds
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
approve refunds to Sandra Leigh Beebe in the amount of $111.51; and to
Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC in the amount of $331.88.
Re: Virginia Blue Ridge Railway Trail Agreement:
Transportation Enhancement Program, Authorization to Execute Project
Agreement with Virginia Department of Transportation Project
EN99-062-120, P101, R201, C501 – UPC# 51977
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nelson,
VA, that the County Administrator, Stephen A. Carter, is hereby
authorized to execute on behalf of Nelson County the Amendment to
Project Development and Administrative Agreement (formerly referred to
as a “Supplemental Agreement”) with the Virginia Department of
Transportation for project EN99-062-120, P101, R201, C501 – UPC#51997,
Virginia Blue Ridge Railway Trail – Nelson County.
Said amendment addresses the $171,000 allocation received in July 2004
by the Commonwealth Transportation Board with maximum federal funds
available for said project of $1,078,000.
C. FY 2005-2006 Budget Amendment
AMENDMENT OF FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Nelson County that the Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Budget be hereby amended as follows:
I. Appropriation of Funds (General Fund)
Amount Revenue Account Expenditure Account
$808.00 3-100-001803-0001 4-100-031020-5409
50,000.00 3-100-002404-0010 4-100-022010-1007
738.00 3-100-002404-0009 4-100-022010-1006
788.27 3-100-002404-0001 4-100-022010-7001
1,500.00 3-100-002404-0004 4-100-031020-7032
74,558.00 3-100-003303-0020 4-100-091050-7031
2,074.50 3-100-009999-0001 4-100-032010-8225
4,975.00 3-100-009999-0001 4-100-013010-1010
$135,441.77
D. Resolution, National Incident Management System
ADOPTION OF THE NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nelson,
VA, to adopt The National Incident Management System in Nelson County,
Virginia.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Nelson County, Virginia, does hereby find as follows:
WHEREAS, the President in Homeland Security Directive (HSPD)-5,
directed the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to
develop and administer a National Incident Management System (NIMS),
which would provide a consistent nationwide approach for Federal,
State, and local governments to work more effectively and efficiently
to prevent, prepare for, respond to and recover from domestic
incidents, regardless of cause, size or complexity;
WHEREAS, the collective input and guidance from all Federal, State, and
local homeland security partners has been, and will continue to be,
vital to the development, effective implementation and utilization of a
comprehensive NIMS;
WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that all Federal, State, and
local emergency agencies and personnel coordinate their efforts to
effectively and efficiently provide the highest levels of incident
management;
WHEREAS, to facilitate the most efficient and effective incident
management it is critical that Federal, State, and local organizations
utilize standardized terminology, standardized organizational
structures, interoperable communications, consolidated action plans,
unified command structures, uniform personnel qualification standards,
uniform standards for planning, training, and exercising, comprehensive
resource management, and designated incident facilities during
emergencies or disasters;
WHEREAS, the NIMS standardized procedures for managing personnel,
communications, facilities and resources will improve county’s ability
to utilize federal funding to enhance local agency readiness, maintain
first responder safety, and streamline incident management processes,
WHEREAS, the Incident Command System components of NIMS are already an
integral part of various city/county incident management activities,
including current emergency management training programs; and
WHEREAS, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks (9-11 Commission)
recommended adoption of a standardized Incident Command System:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED by the Board of Supervisors of
Nelson County, Virginia, that the National Incident Management System
(NIMS) is established as the County standard for incident management.
E. Jackets: Boy’s Soccer Team
Re: Approval to Purchase Jackets for the Boy’s Soccer Team
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
approve the purchase of jackets for the Boy’s Soccer Team winning the
Dogwood District Championship and advancing to the semi-finals of the
Region “B” Tournament in the amount of $1,170.00.
Agenda Item Number III. Public Comments and Presentations
A. Public Comments
Earle Holliday, Wintergreen Resort, spoke in opposition to the request
by High Country Associates, L.L.C. for a Special Use Permit because of
the density of the proposed condos. At a recent property owners’
meeting, Mr. Holiday stated that one hundred and forty-two property
owners were present and all of them spoke in opposition.
Jace Goodling, Nelson County Home Builders’ Association, presented a
collection of comments received to illustrate the problems that home
owners and builders in Nelson County have encountered over the
years. Mr. Goodling stated that the complaints are of a character
nature and not of code disputes. Over the last six months, Mr.
Goodling stated that the Association has seen some improvements in the
Inspections Department, but most importantly, they have seen further
examples of the very actions that they claim have been going on for
many years. Mr. Goodling stated that the Association, along with
dozens of other Nelson County citizens, is requesting the Board of
Supervisors to take appropriate action to correct the problems.
Tom Lanaham expressed concern regarding the Building Inspections Department and the disservice to citizens in the County.
Rick Larkin expressed concern regarding the Building Inspections
Department and stated that he has not done any work in Nelson, but
receives calls about what to do regarding inspections in the
County. Mr. Larkin stated that the Amherst County Building
Official’s Office is swamped with calls regarding what the State Code
actually allows.
A.T. Stevens, Route 782 on Rucker’s Lane Road, requested 2/10 of a mile
be State maintained. The Board noted that the request could
probably be addressed under Rural Addition.
B. VDOT Report
M. C. McCormack, Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of
Transportation, provided a report on issues discussed last month as
follows:
• Report on Rural Rustic Contract (to include Level
Green and Dark Hollow). The contract has been awarded, Dark
Hollow project has started;
• Meeting conducted on August 3rd regarding the change in the Speed Limit on Route 29 from 55 mph to 60 mph;
• The Lovingston Study/Revitalization Project;
• Six Year Plan Public Hearing to be held in September or October; and
• Update on the Bypass status and planned completion dates.
Supervisor Bruguiere reported that the Cub Creek Road has washed out
because of heavy rains; recommended better equipment be used to do the
ditch work on Dark Hollow Road; stated he has spoken with Roger
Collins, Superintendent of Schools regarding the drainage problem on
League Lane and that VDOT has not accepted any calculations from Draper
Aden regarding the repairs; and recommended installing a reduced speed
limit before you approach the construction zone for the Lane Ford
Bridge repair.
Supervisor Harris thanked VDOT for the deceleration lane at the High
School and the Oak Ridge Intersection extension; and requested three
quarters of a mile on Route 661, Phoenix Mountain Road be surface
treated.
Supervisor Brennan thanked VDOT for meeting with Mr. Pierce on Spruce
Creek Lane; reported on a drainage problem on 71 Edge Hill Lane on
Route 6; and requested copies of the booklet outlining how speed limits
are changed for distribution to Board Members.
Supervisor Wood thanked VDOT for setting up the meeting regarding the
change in the speed limit on Route 29; in regard to the issues at the
High School, stated that the back lot still needs to be paved and
reiterated that VDOT will not accept the calculations from Draper Aden;
and questioned what the process is for accepting roads under Rural
Addition into the State System (Mr. McCormack recommended putting
together a summary to include proposed roads to be considered for Rural
Addition).
C. Electoral Board, Voting Machines
Mike Crabill, David McBee, and Susan Gardner, Members of the Electoral
Board, and Lisa Wooten, Register, reported on changes that will have to
be made in Nelson’s voting method required by Federal HAVA rules.
Chairman Crabill stated that the existing machines do not meet
handicapped guidelines and new machines need to be in place by
2006. Mr. Crabill stated that the Electoral Board is hoping to
have one machine in each precinct for the November election before
actually put in use.
After reviewing the available options, Mr. Crabill stated that the
Electoral Board believes the best decision would be to switch over
entirely to the WINvote voting system. A total of thirty machines
is needed; however, Mr. Crabill stated that twelve machines can be
purchased with Federal funds.
If the Board of Supervisors agrees with the Electoral Board’s
recommendation, a supplement of $40,777.50 is needed to proceed with
the purchase. An estimated cost comparison per election was
presented.
Concluding comments from Mr. Crabill, Ann Marie Middleworth gave a demonstration of the WINvote machine.
Following Ms. Middleworth’s demonstration, the Board of Supervisors
discussed the pros and cons of purchasing the new equipment including
recount capabilities; confidentially; training workers and voters to
use the new machines; and conducting a work session with the Electoral
Board.
Concluding discussion, on a motion by Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr.
Harvey, with Mr. Harris voting yes, Mr. Harvey voting yes, Mr.
Bruguiere voting yes, Ms. Brennan voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes,
the Board of Supervisors passed a Resolution authorizing the purchase
of twelve WINvote Voting Machines with Federal funds as follows:
Re: Authorization to the Electoral Board to Purchase Twelve WINvote Voting Machines with Federal Funds
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
authorize the Electoral Board to purchase twelve WINvote Voting
Machines with Federal funds in the amount of $42,000.
D. Wiley & Wilson, Courthouse Project
Randy Vaughan, Wiley & Wilson, presented a power point presentation
on the update of the Courthouse Project. As a result of the
Courthouse Renovation Committee Meeting in July, Mr. Vaughan stated
that Scheme 6 has been established.
Mr. Vaughan stated that potential sites for County Administration have
been identified; new site selection criteria is being developed; two
interested property owners have been identified; and stated that Scheme
Six has been developed based on discussion with the Committee and
property owners.
The Courthouse Design Premises are as follows:
• The historic courthouse will remain the courthouse;
• The historic courthouse is to remain the prominent feature;
• The courthouse green is to remain intact;
• All judicial and county administration functions must be included;
• Everything must fit on the existing site and available adjacent parcels;
• The facility must continue to function through the construction; and
• The old jail building will remain.
The Site Plan for Scheme 6 consists of the existing Packing Shed and
residential property to be purchased by the County. The proposed
New Administration Building Number 1 consists of three floors (total
square feet 23,040); the New Administration Building Number 2 consists
of two floors (total square feet 19,160); and the New Courts Building
consists of two floors (first floor 6,600 square feet and the second
floor 21,621 square feet). The total office space needed is
78,151 and the total space needed for parking is 270 spaces. The
total cost for Scheme 6 is estimated at $20,500,000, exclusive of land
acquisition.
The Committee has recommended relocating the Jefferson Building and to retain the existing old jail.
Concluding Mr. Vaughan’s presentation, Mr. Harvey made a motion and
seconded by Mr. Bruguiere to destroy the existing old jail as follows:
Re: Destroy the Existing Old Jail and Not Include in the Courthouse Renovation Project
On a motion by Mr. Harvey, seconded by Mr. Bruguiere, with Mr. Harvey
voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere voting yes, Ms. Brennan voting no, Mr. Harris
voting no, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution was
adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
recommend the existing Old Jail be destroyed and not included in the
Courthouse Renovation Project.
Re: Relocate the Jefferson Building for Inclusion in the Courthouse Renovation Project
On a motion by Mr. Harvey, seconded by Ms. Brennan, with Mr. Harvey
voting yes, Ms. Brennan voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere voting yes, Mr.
Harris voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution
was adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
relocate the Jefferson Building for inclusion in the Courthouse
Renovation Project.
Re: Approval for the Health Department Building to be Demolished First for the Courthouse Renovation Project
On a motion by Mr. Harvey, seconded by Mr. Harris, with Mr. Harvey
voting yes, Mr. Harris voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere voting yes, Ms.
Brennan voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution
was adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
approve the Health Department Building to be demolished first for the
Courthouse Renovation Project.
Additionally, the Board of Supervisors, by consensus, stated they would
like to acquire property as outlined in Scheme 6 from Jane Lingo (to
acquire the full property and offer her life time rights) and the
Packing Shed for the Courthouse Renovation Project.
E. Nelson County Bicentennial: Staff
Mr. Carter provided information from Maureen Corum, Director of Tourism
and Economic Development, on establishing a Committee for the Nelson
County Bicentennial.
The goal of the Committee is to convene a committee whose
responsibility is to design and implement a yearlong bicentennial
celebration.
Ms. Corum is proposing that a temporary position be established to administer the work of the Committee.
Supervisor Bruguiere stated that he is not in favor of hiring someone and noted that the first step is to appoint a committee.
The Board directed that the Committee consists of ten members including
a representative from each District; the School System; the Historical
Society; a Board Member; a Chamber of Commerce Member; an appointee
from Wintergreen Resort; and Staff Members.
The Board of Supervisors passed a Resolution to create a Bicentennial Committee as follows:
Re: Authorization to Establish a Committee for the 2007 Nelson County Bicentennial Celebration
On a motion by Ms. Brennan, seconded by Mr. Harris, with Ms. Brennan
voting yes, Mr. Harris voting yes, Mr. Harvey voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere
voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution was
adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
authorize establishing a Committee for the 2007 Nelson County
Bicentennial Celebration.
Agenda Item Number IV. Unfinished Business
A. Animal Laws: County Attorney
The Board of Supervisors deferred discussion on Animal Laws.
B. Oxygen System
Mr. Carter stated that Staff is checking on the liability of approving an Oxygen System for Rescue Squad units.
C. GIS Position
Mr. Carter stated that Staff will report on the status of the GIS Position at the September Meeting.
D. Paid EMS Personnel
Mr. Carter reported that Wintergreen has authorized the negotiation for an agreement for paid EMS Personnel.
E. Rockfish Center Lease
Mr. Carter reported that County Attorney Payne will provide information on the Rockfish Center Lease at the September Meeting.
F. Truck Stop
Mr. Carter stated that a meeting has been scheduled with DEQ; County
Attorney Payne; and Tim Castillo, Service Authority Executive Director,
to mitigate problems at the Tye River Truck Stop.
Agenda Item Number V. New Business
Supervisor Harris reported on the proposed Shipman Solid Waste Site and stated cost estimates will be presented in September.
Agenda Item Number VI. Reports, Appointments, Directives, and Correspondences
A. Board of Supervisors Committee Reports
Supervisor Brennan stated that the Thomas Jefferson Planning District
Commission did not meet last month; reported on the Senior Issues
Committee Meeting noting that the Committee conducted a brainstorming
session; discussed a proposed water study for the County; discussed
Personal Property Tax Relief (Mr. Carter will present options at the
September Meeting); reported that a grant has been received to
establish a Government Civic Program; and discussed needed repairs to
the Faber Post Office road.
Supervisor Harris also reported on the Senior Issues Committee Meeting and reiterated that a brainstorming session was held.
B. Appointments
Ms. Carter provided a list of Board and Commission vacancies.
The Board passed a Resolution appointing J. Alphonso Taylor to replace
John Spencer on the Nelson County Economic Development Authority as
follows:
Re: Appointment of J. Alphonso Taylor to an Unexpired Term on the Nelson County Economic Development Authority
On a motion by Mr. Harris, seconded by Ms. Brennan, with Mr. Harris
voting yes, Ms. Brennan voting yes, Mr. Harvey voting yes, Mr.
Bruguiere voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution
was adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
appoint J. Alphonso Taylor to an unexpired term on the Nelson County
Economic Development Authority to replace John Spencer, effective
immediately to expire June 30, 2006.
C. Correspondences
(1) Letter from PVCC
Mr. Carter presented a letter from Frank Friedman, President of PVCC,
stating that the President’s Office of PVCC is dedicating a wall in its
newly-renovated reception area to recognize the college’s service
region and is asking that a photograph representing Nelson County be
donated for this Wall of Honor.
The Board directed Ms. Corum to select a picture to be displayed on the Wall of Honor at PVCC.
Agenda Item Number VII. Closed Meeting
Re: Closed Meeting
On a motion by Ms. Brennan, seconded by Mr. Harris, with Ms. Brennan
voting yes, Mr. Harris voting yes, Mr. Harvey voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere
voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution was
adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That Pursuant to Section 2.2-3711.A.1 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby hold
a Closed Meeting to discuss a Personnel Matter.
Re: Return to Regular Session
On a motion by Ms. Brennan, seconded by Mr. Harris, with Ms. Brennan
voting yes, Mr. Harris voting, Mr. Harvey voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere
voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution was
adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby return to Regular Session.
Re: Certification of Closed Session
On a motion by Ms. Brennan, seconded by Mr. Harvey, with Ms. Brennan
voting yes, Mr. Harvey voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere voting yes, Mr. Harris
voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution was
adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That Pursuant to Section 2.2-3712.D of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, that the Nelson County Board of Supervisors certify
that to the best of each member’s knowledge (i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under Chapter
37 (Virginia Freedom of Information Act) of Title 2.2 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, and (ii) only such public business matters as were
identified in the motion by which the closed meeting was convened were
heard, discussed or considered in the meeting by the public body.
Additionally, concluding the Closed Session, Other Business was discussed as follows:
Re: Accept the Resignation of the Nelson County Building Official
On a motion by Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Bruguiere, with Mr. Harris
voting yes, Mr. Bruguiere voting yes, Mr. Harvey voting yes, Ms.
Brennan voting yes, and Mr. Wood voting yes, the following Resolution
was adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
accept the resignation of the Nelson County Building Official, Mr.
Michael Redifer, effective September 15, 2005 at closed of business,
and authorize the County Administrator to proceed with advertising the
position vacancy resulting from Mr. Redifer's resignation.
Additionally, Ms. Brennan and Messrs. Wood and Harvey stated that they
wished to publicly thank Mr. Redifer for his service and commitment to
Nelson County throughout his tenure as the County's Building
Official. Thereafter, Messrs. Bruguiere and Harris also noted
their appreciation to Mr. Redifer for his service to Nelson County.
Agenda Item Number VIII. Recess and Reconvene for Evening Session
The Board of Supervisors recessed the Meeting at 6:30 p.m. and reconvened the Evening Session at 7:30 p.m.
All Supervisors were present for the evening session which convened at
7:30 P. M. Mr. Wood stated that the order of items on the Agenda
have changed to: 1) Preliminary Subdivision Plat Exception:
Marlo G. Allen; 2) Rezoning #2005-002: Curtis Bruguiere; 3)
Special Use Permit #2005-001: High Country Associates, L.L.C.;
and 4) Ordinance for the Control of Sound Crossing Outdoor Real
Property Boundaries. Items XI, XII, and XIII of the Agenda will
not change. Dates were set for two zoning ordinance work
sessions: August 15 and 29 at 6:00 P. M.
Agenda Item Number X. Public Hearings.
A. Preliminary Subdivision Plat Exception: Marlo G. Allen
Mr. Boger, Planning Director, presented the plat, explaining that Ms.
Allen wishes to divide an existing 5.973 acre parcel (Tax Map
#22-A-64F) into two lots of 2.100 and 3.873 acres. Two property
owners currently use the existing private driveway; the third dwelling
would require that the road be brought up to County standards.
Ms. Allen, represented by Massie Saunders, Surveyor, requested an
exception to this regulation (Sections 4-7-C and 4-6-C of the
Subdivision Ordinance) and presented a proffer stating that there would
be no further division of this property without approval by the Board
of Supervisors. (See plat dated July 13, 2005, Note #8.)
Mr. Wood opened the public hearing. There were no public comments.
On a motion by Mr. Harvey, seconded by Mr. Bruguiere, the Supervisors
voted unanimously by roll call to approve the following Resolution:
Re: Approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plat Exception for Marlo G. Allen.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does
hereby grant to Marlo G. Allen an exception to
Subdivision Ordinance Sections 4-7-C and 4-6-C for
property identified as Tax Map #22-A-64F, and accepts the proffer of no
further division of this property without approval from the Board of
Supervisors.
Agenda Item Number IX. Consideration of Rezoning/Special Use Permit.
A. Rezoning #2005-002: Curtis Bruguiere
Mr. Boger, Planning Director, presented the Staff report and
photographs showing the main and adjacent properties and explained that
Mr. Bruguiere is requesting rezoning of 1.88 acres from R-1 to B-1
(Conditional) to allow a real estate office to be located in a portion
of Anderson’s Store located at 1897 and 1889 Avon Road. The
Planning Commission had previously denied this rezoning for the
following reasons: 1) it constitutes spot zoning; 2) it is not in
keeping with the Comprehensive Plan; and 3) it would have a
detrimental impact on the neighborhood.
Mr. Tommy Bruguiere abstained from the discussion and voting on this
matter. Mr. Wood suggested an alternative would be to withdraw
this application and immediately reapply to rezone to A-1 with a
Special Use Permit. The store would remain non-conforming.
If the August 9, 2005
application is voted on and denied, application could be made a year
later. Ms. Brennan also mentioned the option of postponing for
another month in order to provide additional information to the Board.
Mr. Curtis Bruguiere said he would give further thought to withdrawing
the application and reapplying for A-1 rezoning with a Special Use
Permit, and that he would send a letter to Mr. Boger confirming his
decision. No action was taken by the Board.
B. Special Use Permit #2005-001: High Country Associates, L.L.C.
Mr. Boger, Planning Director, presented a brief staff report and Stuart
Sadler, Attorney representing HCA, provided additional
information. At the July BOS meeting, it was requested that HCA
prepare and present a conceptional plan and provide answers to the
following questions and concerns of the Board.
1) Provide Ms. Tahboub with 120 units so that she can
get financing for senior housing. (This has been done.)
2) Address concern that the 175 units approved on
December 14, 2004 would not be counted in addition to the units
proposed in the application. (This has been done.)
3) Reduce the number of units to be developed. (This has been done.)
The proposal is to permit 120 residential units to be developed on 13.8
acres and effectively downzone 18+ acres from the uses permitted under
multiple use zoning to residential uses that are less than 1/5 of the
density permitted under its existing zoning.
Ms. Brennan asked if there would be timeshares and Mr. Sadler replied
that there would be no timeshares. The units requested are for
senior housing only.
Mr. Sadler presented three different plans and explained the concept to
the BOS. Ms. Brennan acknowledged that a good compromise has been
made, but the number of units changed from 150 to 185. Mr. Sadler
said that modifications were made based on discussions with the County
Attorney and the suggested information has been provided.
Ms. Brennan asked Mr. Payne, County Attorney, if another public hearing
was needed to present the revised plan. Mr. Payne is of the
opinion that there have been two hearings already, but it is the
Board’s decision whether to bring it to the public again. Ms.
Brennan said she was uncomfortable approving the SUP without another
public hearing.
On a motion by Mr. Bruguiere, seconded by Mr. Harris, the Board voted
4-1 (Mr. Bruguiere, Mr. Harvey, Mr. Harris, and Mr. Wood voting Yes and
Ms. Brennan voting No) to approve the following Resolution:
Re: Special Use Permit #2005-001: High Country Associates, L. L. C.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
approve Special Use Permit #2005-001 for High Country Associates,
L.L.C., for a total of 185 development units to be transferred from RPC
single family to mixed use, with 120 units being dedicated to senior
housing and 65 for other family dwellings, as submitted in the SUP
supplement dated July 28, 2005.
Agenda Item Number X. Public Hearings.
B. Ordinance for the Control of Sound Crossing Outdoor Real Property Boundaries
Mr. Payne, County Attorney, stated that the previous “noise ordinance”
has been repealed due to its ambiguity, omission in coverage, outmoded
measurement concept, etc. Recent legislation in the General
Assembly required that counties adopt their own ordinance or comply
with the State’s ordinance. The purpose of this hearing is to
take public comment prior to the BOS voting to adopt the
ordinance. Amendments can be added as directed by the BOS.
He asked that it be kept in mind that this ordinance is referring to
noise received on a homeowner’s property, not at its source.
Mr. Wood said that after the public hearing, two options exist:
1) re-adoption of the emergency ordinance, and 2) direction
to staff for amendments. Mr. Payne said the conservative action
would be to re-adopt and then make changes. If changes are not
major, no additional public hearing would be needed. Ms. Brennan
said that two major items have been addressed: hunting exemptions
and companion animal noise.
The public hearing was opened.
Morris Barrett. Concerns: Restriction on beeping of horns, target shooting, farming mechanics.
Bernard Bibb. Concerns: Firearms, companion dogs,
motorcycles, tractor trailers, etc. Other comments: 2nd
Amendment rights violated, Nelson different from city – same rules
should not apply.
Vickie Robertson. Concerns: Repetitive sound ban on
shooting, sighting, training, practice on firearms, determination of
“persons of normal sensitivities,” violation can be cited on property
owner if offender is not located, restriction on beeping of
horns. Other comments: The problem with Orion has been
taken out on County residents, 2nd Amendment rights violated, ordinance
is waste of time, purpose of ordinance is to control.
Joel Partridge, Lobbyist for NRA. Concerns: Firearms
training, method of enforcing the ordinance, resources for enforcement,
hunters and gun users need to be exempt. Other comments:
BOS has personal agenda, overt attack on 2nd Amendment rights,
unauthorized ordinance under Virginia Code, no need for ordinance –
noise in County is not a problem.
William “Larry” Bethea. Concerns: Testing/firing for
reloading of ammunition. Other comments: Hunting is a small
aspect – defense is the most important. NRA has interpreted the
ordinance is in violation.
Bo Zirkle. Other comments: The hunting is OK. Need to
put limits on how far from a residence you can fire a gun.
George Cheape. Concerns: Noise from children playing in
yard, enforcement – manpower and method. Other comments:
Could be tool for neighbor-against-neighbor, disagrees with the way
this has been done; i.e. adopting the emergency ordinance, urges Board
to repeal or amend as soon as its adopted.
Doris Ragland. Concerns: Companion dogs, including hunting
dogs. Other comments: Ordinance unnecessary for County.
James Shelton. Concerns: Sawmill sounds, noise from
children playing. Other comments: Supervisors’ reelection
in jeopardy, newspaper coverage solicited by BOS members, too much big
government, need to listen to people in County.
Gary Brantley, Sheriff. Concerns: Noise from neighbors,
enforcement – manpower and method, race cars, boat motors, dance halls,
church bells, training for deputies. Other comments: Old
ordinance is OK.
Ron Mauer. Other comments: BOS should invest in 6 sound
pressure meters for 6 months to see if their own families are in
violation.
Sam Mawyer. Concerns: Gun safety. Other
comments: Hard to get anything done in the County – zoning and
building, Supervisors’ reelection in jeopardy.
Gordon Koerner. Other comments: County is stuck with the
State ordinance, handling of emergency ordinance adoption was sneaky,
there can’t be two ordinances on the books at one time, rules were not
followed in adopting the emergency ordinance, underhanded government at
work.
Dee Davis-Wells. Other comments: BOS didn’t consider that
Nelson is rural and diversified, people are not happy, revisit
ordinance and modify.
Buddy Delaney. Other comments: ACLU would love this
ordinance, Hitler confiscated arms – is this next in this County?
Mike Tierney. Concerns: Gun use and practice prohibited,
personal noise. Other comments: These rules and regulations
are not necessary in Nelson.
Barbara Barton. Other comments: Supports noise ordinance, preserves peace and quiet.
Rub Rutherford. Other comments: BOS picks lowest limits of
tolerance, would like answer from Mr. Payne regarding Mr. Koerner’s
question on legality of ordinance.
Cathy Miller. Concerns: Family noise, animal noise, skeet shooting.
Steve Kendall. Concerns: Who judges “reasonableness,” when
to investigate repetitive sounds, unenforceable regulation, dollars for
training and extra personnel. Other comments: Will promote
neighbor-against-neighbor.
David Hayden. Concerns: Target shooting prohibited.
Carlton Ballowe. Concerns: Enforcement. Other
comments: Ordinance not needed, most people don’t want to be
regulated, unless compelling need – leave alone, promotes
neighbor-against-neighbor.
Dee Davis-Wells. Other comments: Is there a valid noise ordinance?
Jimmy Shelton. Other comments: Expects response to questions, BOS reelection in jeopardy.
Gordon Koerner. Other comments: Expects Mr. Payne to say he (Mr. Koerner) is incorrect.
Gracie McFadden Davis. Other comments: Meetings behind closed doors are not right.
Thomas Dennis. Concern: Concealed weapons – need to maintain proficiency by practicing, which is prohibited.
Public hearing was closed.
Mr. Payne stated that without the benefit of research, Roberts Rules of
Order do not apply to the adoption of ordinances, as questioned by Mr.
Koerner. If a statute is passed and the previous one not
repealed, there would be two statutes on the books.
Mr. Wood wanted to clarify that comments made to the Daily Progress
reporter were not correctly quoted and that he did not contact the
media – they contacted him.
Mr. Harvey still has concerns about the ordinance, one being the
industrial businesses in the County, i.e. American Fibers, which would
be unable to meet the sound level limits as stated in the
ordinance. Mr. Bruguiere said he voted for the ordinance after
looking at what the State had recommended. Though the ordinance
is imperfect, it can be enacted and then amended. Mr. Harris had
concerns about passing the emergency ordinance but understands that it
had to be passed or the State ordinance would apply. Ms. Brennan
stated that the passing of the emergency ordinance was awkward, but a
necessity, and that she appreciated the public’s comments and
suggestions. Mr. Wood recapped the major issues presented
by the public, as he understood them to be. They are:
ancillary hunting practices such as sighting in, target practice,
etc.), animal noise (needs to be stated more explicitly), noise from
normal speech, church bells (which are exempt), fireworks noise,
religious activities (which are exempt).
Mr. Harris asked Mr. Payne what the ramifications would be if there is
no ordinance in place. Mr. Payne said he was not clear on that
but would do further research. An ordinance must be adopted
within 60 days of the original adoption or the emergency ordinance
becomes void. It is unclear whether an amended ordinance can be
adopted to replace the emergency ordinance.
Mr. Wood suggested that this ordinance be the first item on the agenda
on August 15 where Mr. Payne can present suggested amendments. In
the meantime, Mr. Payne will look into the possibility of amending the
ordinance before passing it. Any suggestions for changes from the
Board should be forwarded to Mr. Payne immediately. Ms. Brennan
attempted to say to the audience that they could call Board members
with suggestions, but was overridden by noise and rude comments.
A brief recess was taken to clear the room of those who wished to leave.
Agenda Item Number XI. Public Comments
1. Rob Rutherford said the Board should consider a
different approach: tell
the public what they can’t do which would be
2. Gordon Koerner commented that the Board has once
again pushed the issue (noise ordinance) off to August 15 so they could
continue to go after certain groups of people. If it passes on
the 15th, it’ll prove they were “after” gun users. The BOS is not
acting like sensible people.
3. Jim Imbur commented that the abuse aimed at the
BOS during the public hearing was uncalled for and that he respected
the Board for its work. The problems can be resolved, and the
Board answered the concerns very well.
Public comment session was closed.
Agenda Item Number XII. Other Business
None
Agenda Item Number XIII. Adjournment
Re: Continuance of August 9, 2005 Meeting to August 15, 2005
At 11:00 P. M., on a motion by Mr. Harris, with Mr. Harvey providing
the second, the Supervisors voted unanimously to approve the following
Resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Nelson County Board of Supervisors does hereby
continue the August 9, 2005 meeting to August 15, 2005, 6:00 P. M. at
the Board of Supervisors meeting room for the purpose of noise and zoning ordinance review.
_________________, Chair